University
Experts Share Mentoring Skills with Partners of Judges (cont)
Judith Fountain facilitated
large and small group discussions related to the components of mentoring.
She offered guidelines to accomplish the mentors basic goal: help
the mentee deal with issues in a non-emotional way. Rather than responding
immediately, she suggested a mentor 1) stop; 2) step back; 3) detach;
and 4) analyze. To clarify that the mentor understands the mentees
issue, she suggested the following questions be asked:
-
Mentor
Attitudes, Attributes and Skills and Mentor Qualities
were written.
-
The mentees
will be assigned to mentors based on an arranged marriage
model (assigned by third person who matches mentee and mentor based
on specific criteria) versus a dating model (mentee selects
mentor after spending time with all those available to mentor) due
to the short timeframe available in which to make the match.
-
The official
mentoring period will be twelve months with the knowledge, that for
some, a friendship may follow.
-
If, at any
time, a mentee is not comfortable with his/her assigned mentor, the
Supreme Court program staff member will reassign the mentee. Each
mentor/mentee team will do an evaluation after six months.
-
The OJFN
Steering Committee chair, the mentor and the Supreme Court program
staff member will write to each spouse of a new judge upon the judges
election or appointment to the bench and welcome her/him to the judicial
family.
-
The mentor
will contact the mentee no less than quarterly.
-
The Supreme
Court staff member will provide a quarterly informational piece (e.g.,
article, newsletter) to the mentors to be forwarded to the mentees
-
There will
be a minimum of two educational programs for judicial spouses focusing
on judicial family life issues.
-
There will
be a Mentor Program evaluation completed after nine months, and the
data will be used to revise the program for the following year